Friday, November 4, 2016

Lab: Ballistic Pendulum

1.     Lab: Ballistic Pendulum
a.      Lab conducted by Mohammed Karim (author)
2.     Objective –  There were two objectives to this lab. The first being to calculate the initial velocity that the bullet fires into the box, and the second being to prove that the velocity is correct by using the velocity to calculate the distance the ball will travel.
3.     Theory/Introduction – Knowing various concepts like projectile motion, energy, and momentum, can help us accomplish even the most complex of problem. In this lab, we are tasked with finding the initial velocity that the bullet fires into the box, given the length of the “string” and the angle the box travels.  
4.     Apparatus/Procedure –
     The apparatus is pretty much a ready made pendulum. We fired it multiple times, found the average theta, length of the “string”, mass of the bullet, and mass of the box. We then solved for velocity initial of the bullet, which turned out to be 4.837 m/s (See Figure 14.1 for calculations). In order to put this answer to the test, we calculated the distance it would travel before it hits the floor, using the velocity we calculated. We first found time using h=1/2gt^2, and then plugged it into x=vt, giving us 2.1945m. After firing the shot, we got around 2.35-2.43m (See Figure 14.2 for calculations)
5.     Data Tables
Figure 14.1 – Calculation of the initial velocity of the bullet.
Figure 14.2 – Calculations of the distance of the bullet using projectile motion.

6.     Conclusion – Overall, our results were very accurate as our calculations were around 5 percent of our experiment. This is a victory in my book. Had there not been many uncertainties, I would have been 100% correct. These uncertainties include, rounding up values during the multiple calculations, air resistance, uncertainty of force used when firing with the cannon, and uncertainty in measurement of the height and distance the cannon was from the point of impact. Had these little values been exact, I think my answer would have been much closer, if not the same.

No comments:

Post a Comment